The Indian state of Haryana finds itself on high alert, with schools, colleges, and banks closed as security forces brace themselves for potential unrest following the Sarv Jatiya Hindu Mahapanchayat's call for a 'Shobha Yatra' in Nuh district. The situation is further complicated by the suspension of mobile internet services from August 26 to August 28 by the state government.
The 'Shobha Yatra' was scheduled for August 28 in Nuh district, despite Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar denying permission for the procession. The district had previously experienced communal clashes in July, which had left the region tense. The Sarv Jatiya Hindu Mahapanchayat, in its call to resume the Brij Mandal Shobha Yatra, aimed to overcome the previous violence.
The decision to proceed with the 'Shobha Yatra' despite the denial of permission has raised concerns about law and order. To manage the situation, the district administration imposed Section 144, effectively discouraging any movement within Nuh. Educational institutions and banks were closed in anticipation of potential disruptions.
The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), despite the official denial of permission, vowed to peacefully organize the 'Shobha Yatra'. Alok Kumar, a VHP leader, expressed confidence that there would be no law and order issues and assured that the event would be concluded within a shorter timeframe. The VHP's determination to proceed underscores the challenges of balancing religious and communal sentiments with maintaining public order.
The security apparatus in Nuh has been significantly reinforced. Around 1,900 Haryana Police personnel and 24 paramilitary companies have been deployed in the district. Entry points to the area have been sealed off, and the road leading to the Malhar temple, a key location, has been closed. Despite these security measures, traffic on certain expressways will continue as usual.
The tensions surrounding the 'Shobha Yatra' stem from a history of communal violence. In July, clashes erupted in Nuh district during a religious procession by the VHP. This event resulted in fatalities, with six people losing their lives, and set off a chain reaction of violence in other areas as well. The incident was reportedly triggered by the circulation of an objectionable video and the presence of controversial figures in the procession.
In the midst of these tensions, it remains important to strike a balance between religious freedom and public safety. While religious events hold cultural significance, authorities must ensure that they take place within a framework that prioritizes the safety and security of all citizens. The situation in Haryana serves as a reminder of the delicate nature of managing such events in an increasingly interconnected and diverse society.
