The ongoing diplomatic tensions between India and Canada, stemming from allegations made by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau regarding India's involvement in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, have drawn significant attention. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar recently addressed this issue during a press conference in Washington DC, shedding light on key aspects of the dispute.Freedom of Speech vs. Incitement to Violence:
Jaishankar made it clear that India values freedom of speech but believes it should not extend to incitement of violence. He criticized the ongoing pro-Khalistan protests in Canada, emphasizing that these demonstrations should not be viewed as normal and stating that India does not require lessons on freedom of speech from others.
Canada's Commitment to Freedom of Expression:
In response, Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau defended his country's commitment to freedom of expression and peaceful protest while promising to prevent violence and counter hatred. He reiterated Canada's stance that it will always defend freedom of conscience and peaceful protest, but also push back against any form of violence.
India's Concerns and Transparency:
Jaishankar posed a thought-provoking question to the international community: How would other countries react if they faced a similar situation, with their diplomats, embassies, and citizens being intimidated? He stressed the importance of not normalizing the climate of violence and intimidation targeting Indian missions and diplomats in Canada.
During his visit to the United States, Jaishankar confirmed that the issue was discussed with American officials. He highlighted the multifaceted nature of the India-US relationship, acknowledging that while this issue was a part of the conversation, there are numerous areas of cooperation between the two nations.
Not a "Deadlock" but a Permissiveness Problem:
Jaishankar clarified that the current situation shouldn't be labeled a "deadlock." India is open to examining any specific and relevant information provided by the Canadian side regarding the allegations. He attributed the tensions to what he described as Canada's permissiveness regarding terrorism, extremism, and violence, particularly the lack of response to extradition requests for individuals involved in illegal activities in India.
Visa Operations Suspension:
Regarding the suspension of visa operations to Canada, Jaishankar expressed India's reluctance but explained that the decision was made due to the challenging operating environment created by the Canadian side. He pointed out the consistent intimidation faced by Indian diplomatic personnel in Canada, making it unsafe for them to carry out their duties.
International Involvement:
During his visit, Jaishankar also discussed the Canadian allegations with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. The U.S. urged India to cooperate with the Canadian investigation.
In conclusion, the India-Canada diplomatic row revolves around freedom of speech, violence, and allegations of Indian involvement in a high-profile killing. The dispute underscores the complexities of international relations, with both sides expressing their positions while emphasizing their commitment to democratic values and freedom of expression. The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve the issues at hand.
